Why I will not buy a Hasselblad

Hasselblad Used to Mean Something. Giving Gear Away to YouTubers Is Changing That.

For as long as I’ve been into photography, Hasselblad has occupied a different tier in my mind than almost any other camera brand. It wasn’t just equipment — it was an aspiration. The kind of system you worked toward, saved for, and eventually earned the right to own. Hasselblad’s reputation was built on precision, exclusivity, and a legacy that stretched from medium-format studio work to the Moon landing. Owning one said something about where you were in your craft.

That’s part of why it’s been so disappointing to watch the brand hand out its gear for free to YouTubers in exchange for video coverage.

When Aspiration Turns Into Advertising

I understand the business logic. Influencer seeding is cheap, effective marketing, and Hasselblad is hardly the only company doing it. But there’s a real cost to this strategy when the brand in question has spent decades cultivating an image of rarity and craftsmanship. When a camera that once felt like a milestone shows up unboxed by a creator who didn’t pay for it, didn’t necessarily earn it, and may not even keep using it past the sponsored video, the equipment stops feeling special. It starts to feel like product placement.

The exclusivity was never just about price. It was about the sense that the people using this gear had deliberately chosen it, often after years with other systems. Free gear handed out for exposure undercuts that entirely. It signals that the brand cares more about impressions and click-through rates than about its relationship with the photographers who actually buy into its ecosystem.

View fullsize

Roberts Cottages in Oceanside shot on my Hasselblad 500CM

The Trust That Gets Spent

Brands like Hasselblad don’t just sell hardware — they sell a story about what owning that hardware means. Every giveaway aimed at growing a YouTube channel’s subscriber count chips away at that story a little more. It reframes the camera as just another tech product competing for attention rather than a tool with a legacy worth respecting.

I had genuinely planned to upgrade to Hasselblad gear at some point. That’s no longer the plan. Not because the cameras got worse, but because the brand’s own marketing has made me wonder what, exactly, I’d be buying into.

A Brand’s Choice to Make

None of this means influencer marketing is inherently wrong, or that other companies haven’t done the same thing without consequence. But Hasselblad built its name on being different — on standing apart from the churn of constant product cycles and algorithm-chasing content. Free gear for YouTubers is a strategy brands use to manufacture relevance. It’s not a strategy that fits a brand that already has it.

If Hasselblad wants to retain the loyalty of photographers who see the brand as something to work toward, it might want to reconsider whose hands its cameras end up in—and why.

Changed my mind about film cameras

As I have mentioned, I sold most of my gear in 2024. I initially had plans to purchase another 500 or 501 body because I liked the camera. However every time I go to look and shop for one I just have this bad taste in my mouth. I feel like I have been betrayed. I may eventually buy another film camera, but it is very, very unlikely that I will ever support the new Hasselblad that gives away free cameras to people who make videos. I understand what they wanted to do, but they should not have given them. They could have either invited several influencers to an event or just let them use them for a short period.

Schneider Center Filter Color Shift: How It Ruined My 6x17 Shoots and What I Learned the Hard Way

I thought I was doing everything right. I had invested in a Schneider center filter for my panoramic 6x17 setup, and headed out on multiple shoots confident that I was getting the best possible results. What I didn’t know - what nobody told me - was that the Schneider center filter color shift problem was quietly destroying my images one frame at a time. Now I’m looking at a list of reshoots that didn’t need to happen, several frames from a recent Miami trip that I lost, and a hard lesson learned about assuming a premium piece of glass does exactly what it promises.

What Is the Schneider Center Filter Color Shift Problem?

For anyone working in the 6x17 panoramic format, a center filter is designed to correct the natural light falloff that occurs with ultra-wide-angle lenses. Because of the extreme angle of coverage required to fill that long, narrow negative, light reaching the edges of the frame is significantly dimmer than light hitting the center. A center filter compensates for this by being denser in the middle and gradually becoming more transparent toward the edges, effectively evening out the exposure across the entire panoramic frame.

On paper, it’s an elegant solution. In practice, it comes with a serious and frustrating side effect: a color cast that damages the image in two distinct ways. This is the Schneider center-filter color-cast issue that the large-format photography community has discussed for years, and one I wish I had researched more carefully before committing to real shoots.

How the Problem Showed Up in My 6x17 Work

I had several shoots lined up - primarily architectural exteriors in urban environments, streetscapes, and buildings - all requiring the wide panoramic coverage that the 6x17 format delivers so well. I added the Schneider center filter to every frame because that’s what you’re supposed to do with this format, right? The filter exists precisely for this purpose. It felt like responsible shooting practice.

When the results came back, something was clearly wrong, and it took me longer than I’d like to admit to figure out exactly what I was looking at.

The Schneider center filter color shift in my 6x17 negatives appeared as a very specific and troubling pattern. The center of the image was pulling a yellowish-brown overlay - a warm, muddy tone that sat over what should have been a clean, neutral rendering in the middle of the frame. Meanwhile, the edges and corners were moving in the opposite direction, developing a noticeable blue cast, especially in the darker tonal areas. Since a large portion of my architectural work includes asphalt in the foreground - parking lots, streets, driveways - that blue shift in the corners was impossible to ignore. Asphalt that should render as a neutral dark gray was reading distinctly cool and blue, particularly toward the outer edges of the panoramic frame.

The result was an image that looked as if it had been processed with two conflicting color grades applied simultaneously - warm and yellow-brown in the center, and blue and cold at the edges. This is not a look I can live with. And it’s not a problem that announces itself clearly until you’re already committed to the shots.

At first, I considered the film, then the processing, then the scanning. It took real troubleshooting to finally land on the Schneider center filter as the source. By that point, the damage had been done across multiple negatives, multiple locations, and multiple projects.

Why This Happens

The core issue is that no center filter is truly color neutral. The graduated density that makes the filter function is created using materials that interact with different wavelengths of light in ways that are not perfectly consistent across the color spectrum. In the 6x17 panoramic format, this problem is potentially amplified because the format demands so much from the edges of the image circle-the very areas where the filter’s optical properties transition most rapidly.

The yellowish-brown center cast and the blue edge shift are two sides of the same problem: the filter is not transmitting color uniformly as its density changes from center to edge. Under real-world shooting conditions - mixed light, architectural subjects with strong tonal contrast, foreground elements like asphalt that reveal color shifts plainly - these inconsistencies become highly visible.

This isn’t a manufacturing defect in the traditional sense. It’s a well-documented characteristic of Schneider center filters that experienced photographers have discussed at length in large-format photography communities. The frustrating part is that Schneider does not prominently disclose this, and for photographers using center filters for the first time on 6x17 work, there is no built-in warning that the correction they’re adding to address vignetting also introduces a color problem they may not immediately recognize.

There Is No Perfect Fix - But There Are Options

I want to be direct about this: there is no single, clean solution to the Schneider center filter color-shift problem. What the photography community has come up with are workarounds, and their effectiveness depends heavily on your workflow and how much post-processing time you’re willing to invest per image.

I have not tried these filters, but the most commonly recommended hardware alternative is switching to a Rodenstock center filter. Rodenstock filters have a strong reputation within the large-format community for being more color-neutral, and many photographers report using them successfully on Schneider lenses of the same filter thread size. The redesigned Rodenstock center filters in particular are widely cited as the most neutral option currently available. If color accuracy is critical to your work, this is the closest thing to a genuine in-camera solution.

In Lightroom, the Masking tool in the Develop module lets you isolate specific areas of an image - including corners - and apply selective color temperature adjustments. For a 6x17 negative with different color problems in the center versus the edges, this means potentially building separate masks for the warm center zone and the cool edge zones and correcting them independently. It can be done, but it is time-consuming; it requires careful work on every affected frame, and the results are not always fully convincing because the cast is not a clean, uniform shift - it’s a gradual gradient that changes across the frame.

What I’m Doing Now

I’ve stopped shooting with center filters entirely, and I don’t plan to go back.

After going through the troubleshooting process, dealing with the reshoot obligations, and honestly evaluating the time I’ve spent trying to correct these color problems in post, I’ve come to a straightforward conclusion: it is easier to correct for vignetting itself - or just allow it to be there - than it is to try to figure out the color correction for what the Schneider center filter introduces. Vignetting in the 6x17 format is a real issue, but it’s predictable. I can correct for light falloff in post-processing with a radial gradient and luminosity adjustments, which take minutes per image. The color shift from the center filter - the yellowish-brown center overlay, the blue corner cast, the uneven gradient between them - takes far longer to address and never corrects as cleanly.

The center filter was supposed to simplify my workflow. Instead, it complicated it in ways that cost me time and money. Removing it from my kit was the right decision.

If you’re researching the Schneider center filter color problem before committing to serious work in the 6x17 format, you’re already in a better position than I was. Test thoroughly under real shooting conditions - especially if your work includes architectural subjects and foreground elements like asphalt that will reveal color shifts immediately. The Schneider center filter color shift is real, it’s well-documented, and the cost of discovering it on the job is higher than most photographers expect.

Shoot without it. Correct the vignetting in post. Move on.

Bowie House Fort Worth - Gorgeous Design and Frustrating Execution

I went into this stay expecting a polished, high-end experience given the price point and reputation, and on the surface, Bowie House delivers — the design and furnishings are genuinely impressive. The room felt curated, with an upscale, boutique feel, and small touches, like the art and photography books left out for guests, added some personality to the space. When you actually managed to get a staff member in person, they were polite, warm, and attentive.

Unfortunately, much of the experience felt like style over substance, and several basic functional choices left me questioning whether anyone had actually tested this room from a guest’s perspective.

The light switches were genuinely one of the most frustrating parts of the stay. There’s nothing intuitive about them, and it took real trial and error just to figure out which switch controlled which light. Once the room was dark, this became a serious problem — there was no traditional switch you could feel for in the dark, so turning a light back on meant fumbling around blindly. For a property at this price tier, that’s an inexcusable oversight. It’s the kind of thing that sounds minor until you’re standing in a pitch-black room at 2am trying to find a bathroom light.

Then there’s the lack of basics. No coffee maker in the room — at a luxury hotel, in 2026, that feels like an odd corner to cut. No desk to work at either, which is a real problem if you’re traveling for any reason beyond pure leisure. And in the middle of summer, housekeeping had piled a heavy fur blanket on the bed — completely impractical for the season and clearly more about aesthetics than guest comfort.

Small details added up too. The trash cans in the room were tiny, barely larger than a tennis ball, which is almost comically impractical. And there wasn’t even a trash can near the door when exiting the restroom — a small thing, but the kind of thing that makes you wonder about the overall thoughtfulness of the design.

The most irritating part of the stay, though, was the communication. I had a clear “No Service Needed / Do Not Disturb” sign on my door, and the hotel still texted me asking when they wanted to come service the room. The property seems to rely heavily — almost exclusively — on texting for guest communication, and it comes across as impersonal and, frankly, a little tone-deaf when it overrides something as explicit as a door sign. It felt like dealing with a bot rather than a hotel staff member who was actually paying attention.

And then there are the cowboy-themed uniforms for the wait staff, which felt like a forced bit of Fort Worth branding that came across as gimmicky rather than charming.

Overall, Bowie House has all the makings of a great hotel — beautiful spaces, nice furnishings, and capable staff — but it’s let down by a string of practical missteps that shouldn’t exist at this price point. The design team clearly put a lot of thought into how the rooms look, but not nearly enough into how they actually function for someone staying there. For the cost, I expected a more seamless experience.

View fullsize

Bowie House Luxury Hotel in Fort Worth Texas